
The AllThing
All stick and no carrot, since oughtthree.
各位能夠讀中文得來賓您好。小的這還在學中文中，恐怕中文寫得不太好，希望你們還看得懂。
子夜秋歌 (李白)
長安一片月，萬戶搗衣聲。
秋風吹不盡，總是玉關情。
何日平胡虜，良人罷遠征。
Contact:
 web page
Other views:
RSS 1.0
RSS 0.91
Plain (good for lynx)
Past posts:
Recent comments:
Re: Tennessee Waltz by janet
Re: The Boston Syndrome by
Recent search referers:
XIII no cd
bittorrent chinese
crack xiii torrent
"bit torrent" "band of brothers" 7 8
bit torrent band of brothers 7 8
crack for XIII
gtavc crack
torrent xbox
XIII crack fix
XIII "nocd crack"
seven samurai torrent
BitTorrent crack
seven samurai bit torrent (x3)
bit torrent pr0n
pr0n torrent (x3)
chinese bit torrent
Exits:
William's Aggregated Feeds
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.



The Koran, allegedly, is the origin of the half your age plus seven rule (i.e. as the lower limit for dating/sex). But modern times call for modern rules, and thus I'd like to introduce the concept of log age.
Because the modern age is digital, and because it just works out better this way, we'll be using base 2. Your log age is simply log base 2 of your regular age. We'll stay with the traditional practice of dropping everything past the decimal point in casual conversation, so here's the quick conversion chart:
Traditional age  Log age
=========================
< 1  don't ask
1  0
23  1
47  2
815  3
1631  4
3263  5
64127  6
(So that solves my birthday problem, at least—I'm still 4.)
Now for dating, we'd like a radius of .5 in the log domain, i.e. you can date anyone half a logyear younger to half a logyear older than you. That works out to:
dating_radius = trad_age / (2 * sqrt(2))
which means I can legally date anyone from 16.1 to 33.8 years old. Modern times being more liberal, I guess.


Posted at 10:00  trackback  5 comments  back

and you wonder
Janet wrote on some point before Fri, 12 Sep 2003 22:17

why you were left the Lolita book.
Reply

alison wrote on some point before Fri, 12 Sep 2003 22:17

Since we are the same age, I fall into the same range. Can you imagine me dating at 16 year old? I think not. Perhaps there should be separate ranges for men and women? Additionally, according to your rules, the 16 year old cannot date you.
Reply

excellent point...
William wrote on some point before Fri, 12 Sep 2003 22:17

... that the log date rule is not reflexive. hadn't thought about that. the solution (which also addresses your other concern) is to only require the upper limit, and have the lower limit be implicit, like the koran does. the rule for upper age limit is still a + a/(2*sqrt(2)) the new rule for lower age limit is: (a * 2*sqrt(2)) / (1 + 2*sqrt(2)) this raises our lower age limit to 18.47 and ensures everything is reflexive. thanks, alison!
Reply

alison wrote on some point before Fri, 12 Sep 2003 22:17

Ok, glad that worked out, but isn't it a little complicated? I think that until you get arrested, all's well. :)
Reply

great minds think alike
wrote on some point before Fri, 12 Sep 2003 22:17 
http://bolson.org/cgibin/dage is brian olson's very similar logbased dating age range calculator.
Reply

